A New Middle Ground Between Mandatory MLS Listings and Private Networks
For the past several years, the industry debate has been framed as a simple choice:
- Should every publicly marketed listing be entered into the MLS?
- Or should brokers and sellers be free to market listings privately before exposing them to the broader market?
The lawsuits involving Compass, NWMLS, Zillow, and other industry participants have largely revolved around those competing philosophies. But California Regional MLS (CRMLS) may have quietly introduced a third option that deserves national attention.
Rather than choosing between full public exposure and complete privacy, CRMLS has separated broker cooperation from public internet distribution.
That distinction may prove to be one of the most significant policy developments in the MLS industry this year.
Cooperation Does Not Necessarily Mean Public Display
Traditionally, many practitioners have treated these concepts as inseparable:
- MLS cooperation
- MLS participation
- IDX distribution
- Portal display
- Public marketing
CRMLS now recognizes that these functions can be managed independently.
Under its new Limited Exposure Coming Soon process, a listing is entered into the MLS and made available to all MLS participants for cooperation, while the seller may instruct that the property not be distributed through IDX feeds to consumer portals during the Coming Soon period.
This means the listing is not “off market.”
Instead, it is fully available within the professional real estate marketplace while allowing the seller greater control over when the broader consumer market first sees the property.
Mandatory MLS Submission Remains Intact
Importantly, CRMLS has not weakened its implementation of Clear Cooperation.
Once public marketing occurs, the listing must still be entered into the MLS within one business day.
Instead of remaining outside the MLS, however, the listing may enter as Coming Soon, satisfying MLS cooperation requirements while postponing broader internet exposure if directed by the seller.
In other words, CRMLS appears to be saying:
Enter the listing into the MLS.
Cooperate with every MLS participant.
Allow the seller—not the MLS—to decide when broader internet distribution should occur.
That is a meaningful policy distinction.
No Showings Means No Private Preview Advantage
One important safeguard should not be overlooked.
CRMLS prohibits showings or open houses while a property remains in Coming Soon status — the “no showing” rule is absolute, even for the listing broker.
Not only are in-person showings prohibited, but virtual showings and virtual open houses are also prohibited. If a seller wants buyers to begin touring the property, the listing must first be changed to Active. Offers, however, may still be submitted and accepted while the property remains in Coming Soon status.
This eliminates one of the major criticisms often directed at “private listing” strategies—that selected buyers receive early access before the broader marketplace.
Instead, every MLS participant has equal knowledge that the property exists, but no one gains an exclusive showing opportunity.
A Different Way to Think About Transparency
This approach reframes the industry’s current debate.
Instead of asking:
“Should listings be entered into the MLS?”
the more useful question may become:
“Once a listing is entered into the MLS, who should control where else it is displayed, and when?”
CRMLS appears to answer that question by placing greater emphasis on seller choice while preserving MLS cooperation among brokers.
That may represent a practical compromise between competing philosophies.
It effectively establishes a concept of distribution rights:
- The seller owns the listing.
- The seller grants specific distribution rights to the listing broker.
- Those rights are not automatically shared with every cooperating broker.
- The cooperating broker has authority to represent buyers—not to be an independent distributor of the seller’s listing
- Cooperation in selling is different from authority to publish.
Will Other MLSs Follow?
The industry has become increasingly polarized between advocates of maximum public exposure and supporters of greater seller discretion.
CRMLS suggests those objectives may not be mutually exclusive.
A listing can:
- satisfy Clear Cooperation requirements,
- be available to every cooperating MLS participant,
- preserve equal broker access,
- delay broader internet distribution at the seller’s request, and
- prohibit showings until the listing becomes Active.
Whether other MLSs adopt similar policies remains to be seen.
However, as litigation over listing distribution continues and brokers seek greater flexibility without abandoning MLS cooperation, CRMLS may have outlined a model that deserves careful study.
Sometimes the most significant policy changes are not the ones that generate the loudest headlines. They are the ones that quietly redefine the assumptions underlying the debate.
CRMLS may have done exactly that.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Today, a listing is no longer simply a property record. It is the industry’s most valuable business asset. Whoever controls the listing controls consumer relationships, lead generation, advertising opportunities, artificial intelligence training data, and billions of dollars in downstream services.
That explains why brokerages want greater control before MLS entry, why portals insist on broad consumer access, and why MLSs find themselves caught in the middle. CRMLS appears to be responding to broker concerns about maintaining control over marketing while still giving sellers flexibility – see documented guidelines below.
RELATED READING:
https://go.crmls.org/coming-soon-form/ Seller Instruction to Place Listing into CRMLS Coming Soon Status (Revised 6/26)
https://kb.crmls.org/knowledgebase/coming-soon-faqs/ – answers 25 key questions — (no showings, offers allowed, 21-day limit)
https://kb.crmls.org/knowledgebase/registered-vs-coming-soon/ — Here is a simple chart to help you differentiate registered vs coming soon
https://go.crmls.org/limited-exposure-form/ — Seller’s Instructions for Limited Exposure in Coming Soon Status
https://thedataadvocate.com/real-estate-industry-at-a-crossroads/ — The central question facing the industry today: should a residential listing belong first to the open MLS marketplace, or first to the brokerage that signed the seller? The answer will reshape how listings flow, where consumers find homes, which businesses capture the revenue, and what the MLS exists to do.



4 Responses
Nice piece John! Isn’t this new marketing option offered by CRMLS just the Delayed Marketing Exempt Listing policy option that NAR created awhile back? It’s the in-between which (allegedly) makes everyone happy?
Good question, Summer. One key distinction is with the no-showings restriction. When I checked under NAR’s FAQ, an MLS cannot prohibit showings for Delayed Marketing Exempt Listings. They are considered active listings, and the decision whether to allow showings belongs to the seller and listing broker, subject to local MLS rules.
By contrast, a CRMLS Coming Soon listing has historically prohibited all showings until the listing becomes Active under their rules. Also, NAR leaves it up to the MLS to determine the days for the delayed window — CRMLS is fixed at 21 days with the Limited Exposure Coming Soon policy.
Ask and you shall receive! Thank you so much, John!
Always great hearing from you, Summer. I missed not seeing your son’s #17 in the baseball All-Star game!