Category: NAR Settlement

When the Feed Stops – Lessons from Zillow v. MRED and Compass

A well capitalized brokerage underwriting a single MLS’s national footprint challenges the geographic MLS model that has organized this industry for a century. Every regional MLS should be discussing what that means for its market, its Participants and Subscribers, and its future.

Read More »

The Case the Industry Forgot —  Part 1 of 8

The decree’s core principle fits in one sentence: a broker may not decide what a rival broker’s customers are allowed to see. Display decisions belong to the seller. Data flows to every cooperating broker on cost based, equal terms.

Read More »

Rewriting Fair Play: What Real Estate Can Learn from Baseball’s Shake-Up

Real estate isn’t a game, but it is a profession grounded in credibility and a belief in fairness. And right now, the Department of Justice is making one thing clear—competition in the industry isn’t just a value; it’s a legal imperative. Whether through antitrust litigation, scrutiny of cooperative compensation, or the push for open access to listing data, the message is the same: if consumers don’t have real choices, the system isn’t working.

Read More »

Just Who Is Roger P. Alford?

Roger P. Alford will serve as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General. Mr. Alford previously served in the first Trump Administration as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division, including as an expert witness in the landmark 2023 real estate $1.8 billion litigation against the National Association of Realtors

Read More »

The ‘New Norm’ For Real Estate Professionals

The competition has always been fierce among seller agents to create listing presentations in order to secure the sacred listing. However, there was little competition among those wanting to represent buyers, other than the inevitable procuring cause disputes between brokers who provided specific services to the unrepresented buyer.

Read More »

Clear Cooperation Policy: Open or Closed?

The antitrust laws protect competition in both upstream and downstream product markets. The Sherman Act “does not confine its protection to consumers, or to purchasers, or to competitors, or to sellers.”

Read More »

Search

Other articles